We help organizations prove what happened — and who authorized it — when it matters most.
Designed for Low Disruption
No production access required
No standing meetings
No confidential data required
Written deliverables only
Email-first, asynchronous engagement
Services are the fastest way to engage. If a review reveals strong fit, we can discuss pilots or licensing for deployable governance rails.
Proof Before Power provides verification-only evidence reviews for organizations operating high-risk or automated systems.
We evaluate whether your existing governance and evidence artifacts are sufficient to independently reconstruct and defend privileged actions after an incident, audit, dispute, or regulatory review.
This work is asynchronous, low-interaction, and non-confidential by design.
Services are the fastest way to engage. If a review reveals strong fit, we can discuss pilots or licensing for deployable governance rails.
Who This Is For
Proof Before Power is designed for organizations that already operate complex or high-risk systems — and need to be able to independently prove what happened after an incident, audit, dispute, or regulatory review.
Common use cases include:
Crypto exchanges, custodians, and issuers
AI / automation-heavy enterprises
Incident response, security, and governance teams
Organizations preparing for regulatory, insurance, or board scrutiny
How It Works
You request intake (email-first)
We send a short questionnaire + secure folder
You upload redacted or synthetic artifacts
We deliver written findings and templates
Calls are optional. Everything works asynchronously, and all deliverables are provided in writing.
What This Is Not
Not a penetration test
Not a SOC 2 or compliance audit
Not legal advice
Not a certification or attestation
This is a verification-only evidence sufficiency review, delivered as written analysis.
Why Proof Before Power
Systems fail. People make decisions under pressure.
What matters afterward is not intent — but proof.
Successful execution is not the same as provable authorization.
FACTS
Do you need access to our systems? → No
Can we use redacted data? → Yes
Will this hold up with auditors or insurers?” → That’s the explicit design goal.